determinism of universe
The underlying assumptions and philosophical implications of
classical physics are so familiar that you may have never given them a second
thought. For example, classical physics ascribes to the universe an objective
reality, an existence external to and independent of human observers. This
assumption reassures us that when we do research in physics, we are studying
what is actually "out there," beyond and distinct from our
consciousness, and that we can design experiments that do not affect in any significant
way the systems they measure. That is, in an objective universe we can control
the interaction between the observer and the observed and, if clever enough,
can make this interaction negligibly weak.
Our other central assumption about the nature of the
classical universe is that it's predictable: knowing the initial conditions of
the constituents of any system, however complicated, we can use Newton's Laws
to predict its future. Precisely, without ambiguity or uncertainty. This notion
is the essence of determinism, which, supported by Newtonian mechanics,
dominated philosophical thinking until the advent of quantum theory. If the
universe is determinate, then for every effect there must be a cause. After
all, if all events, all phenomena can be predicted and explained precisely by
physics, then it must be possible to backtrack from any event to find,
somewhere in the dim recesses of history, its cause. We may have to look long
and hard-the bird that just fell off a tree limb outside my window may have
been influenced by an event during the Peloponnesian wars-but somewhere there
is a cause. Or so says the principle of causality.
Causality was an important element of nineteenth century
philosophy. It had important implications for physicists of that era, for it
guaranteed the reproducibility of experiments-i.e., that two identical systems
with the same initial conditions (i.e., in the same state) subject to the same
measurement will yield identical results. Same causes: same effects. Very neat
and tidy.
I suppose the deterministic world view implied by Newtonian
mechanics could, even today, seem comforting, for it implies that the universe
can be understood fully and dealt with rationally. But it has a dark side. For
example, if the universe is ruled by causality, then free will is a meaningless
concept, for the universe is a vast, mindless machine that controls our every
action, our every decision. Everything that happens happens because of
something that happened in the past, not because we chose to make it happen.
According to this view, if you "decide" to get married or to take a
job or to collect water buffalo, you do so not by choice but because of past
events. In such a universe, our loves, hopes, and dreams are but delusions,
hiding the grim reality that we are but cogs in Descartes' clockwork machine.
Goals are irrelevant; human aspirations pointless.
Thus, determinism is a dehumanizing philosophy. It describes
a universe that is infinitely predictable, holding few surprises. All can be
known; nothing is unexpected.
Determinism is boring. It is also wrong.
The source:
Michael A. Morrison - Understanding Quantum Physics.
By. Fady Tarek
0 comments:
Post a Comment